THE LESSONS OF THE SPANISH REVOLUTION
In honor of the tragically too few Bolshevik-Leninists who fought for
socialist revolution in the Spanish Civil War. Below is a customer review I
wrote on Leon Trotsky’s The Spanish Revolution, 1931-39 for Amazon.com which
can serve as a tribute to their efforts.
AS WE APPROACH THE 77TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE
BEGINNING OF THE SPANISH CIVIL WAR
MILITANTS NEED TO DRAW THE LESSONS FOR THE DEFEAT OF THAT REVOLUTION.
I have been interested, as a pro-Republican partisan, in the Spanish
Civil War since I was a teenager. What
initially perked my interest, and remains of interest, is the passionate
struggle of the Spanish working class to create its own political organization
of society, its leadership of the struggle against Spanish fascism and the
romance surrounding the entry of the International Brigades, particularly the
American Abraham Lincoln Battalion of the 15th Brigade, into the struggle.
Underlying my interests has always been a
nagging question of how that struggle could have been won by the working class.
The Spanish proletariat certainly was capable of both heroic action and the
ability to create organizations that reflected its own class interests i.e. the
worker militias and factory committees. Of all modern working class revolutions
after the Russian revolution Spain
showed the most promise of success. Bolshevik leader Leon Trotsky noted that
the political class consciousness of the Spanish proletariat was higher than
that of the Russian proletariat in 1917. Yet it failed in Spain . Trotsky's writings on this period represent
a provocative and thoughtful approach to an understanding of the causes of that failure.
Moreover, with all proper historical proportions considered, his analysis has
continuing value as the international working class struggles against the
seemingly one-sided class war being waged by the international bourgeoisies
today.
The Spanish Civil War of 1936-1939 has
been the subject of innumerable works from every possible political and
military perspective possible. A fair number of such treatises, especially from
those responsible for the military and political policies on the Republican side, are
merely alibis for the disastrous policies that led to defeat. Trotsky's complication of
articles, letters, pamphlets, etc. which make up the volume reviewed here is an
exception. Trotsky was actively trying to intervene in the unfolding events in
order to present a program of socialist revolution that most of the active
forces on the Republican side were fighting, or believed they were fighting for.
Thus, Trotsky's analysis brings a breath of fresh air to the historical
debate. That in the end Trotsky could not organize the necessary cadres to
carry out his program or meaningfully impact the unfolding events in Spain
is one of the ultimate tragedies of that revolution. Nevertheless, Trotsky had a damn
good idea of what forces were acting as a roadblock to revolution. He also had a
strategic conception of the road to victory. And that most definitely was not
through the Popular Front.
The central question Trotsky addresses
throughout the whole period under review here was the crisis of revolutionary
leadership of the proletarian forces. That premise entailed, in short, a view
that the
objective conditions for the success of a socialist program for society had
ripened. Nevertheless, until that time, despite several revolutionary upheavals
elsewhere, the international working class had not been successful anywhere
except in backward Russia .
Trotsky thus argued that it was necessary to focus on the question of forging
the missing element of revolutionary leadership that would assure victory or at
least put up a fight to the finish.
This underlying premise was the continuation
of an analysis that Trotsky developed in earnest in his struggle
to fight the Stalinist degeneration
of the Russian Revolution in the mid-1920's. The need to learn the lessons of the Russian Revolution and to extend
that revolution internationally was thus not a merely a theoretical question
for Trotsky. Spain ,
moreover, represented a struggle where the best of the various leftist forces
were in confusion about how to move forward. Those forces could have profitable
heeded Trotsky's advice. Moreover,
the question of the crisis of revolutionary leadership still remains to be resolved by the international
working class.
Trotsky's polemics in this volume are highlighted by the article ‘The
Lessons of Spain-Last Warning’, his definitive assessment of the Spanish
situation in the wake of the defeat of the Barcelona
uprising in May 1937. Those polemics center on the failure of the Party of
Marxist Unification (hereafter, POUM) to provide revolutionary leadership. That
party, partially created by cadre formerly associated with Trotsky in the
Spanish Left Opposition, failed on virtually every count. Those conscious
mistakes included, but were not limited to,
the creation of an unprincipled bloc between the former Left
Oppositionists and the former Right Oppositionists (Bukharinites) of Maurin to
form the POUM in 1935; political support
to the Popular Front including entry into the government coalition by its
leader; creation of its own small trade union federation instead of entry in
the anarchist led-CNT; creation of its own militia units reflecting a hands-off
attitude toward political struggle with
other parties; and, fatally, an at best equivocal role in the Barcelona
uprising of 1937.
Trotsky had no illusions about the roadblock to revolution of the
policies carried out by the old-time Anarchist, Socialist and Communist
Parties. Unfortunately the POUM did. Moreover, despite being the most honest
revolutionary party in Spain
it failed to keep up an intransigent struggle to push the revolution forward.
The Trotsky - Andreas Nin (key leader of the POUM and former Left
Oppositionist) correspondence in the Appendix makes that problem painfully clear.
The most compelling example of this failure -
As a result of the failure of the Communist Party of Germany to oppose the rise
of Hitler in 1933 and the subsequent decapitation and the defeat of the
Austrian working class in 1934 the European workers especially the younger
workers of the traditional Socialist Parties started to move left. Trotsky
observed this situation and told his supporters to intersect that development by an
entry, called the ‘French turn’, into those parties. Nin and the Spanish Left
Opposition, and later the POUM failed to do that. As a result the Socialist
Party youth were recruited to the Communist Party en masse. This accretion
formed the basic for its expansion as a party and key cadre of its notorious
security apparatus that would, after the Barcelona
uprising, suppress the more left ward organizations. For more such examples of
the results of the crisis of leadership in the Spanish Revolution read this book.
No comments:
Post a Comment