From The American
Left History Blog Archives (2007)-On American Political Discourse
Markin comment:
In 2007-2008 I, in vain,
attempted to put some energy into analyzing the blossoming American
presidential campaign since it was to be, as advertised at least, a watershed
election, for women, blacks, old white anglos, latinos, youth, etc. In the
event I had to abandon the efforts in about May of 2008 when it became obvious,
in my face obvious, that the election would be a watershed only for those who
really believed that it would be a watershed election. The four years of the
Obama presidency, the 2012 American presidential election campaign, and world
politics have only confirmed in my eyes that that abandonment was essentially
the right decision at the right time. In short, let the well- paid bourgeois
commentators go on and on with their twitter. I, we, had (have) better things
to do like fighting against the permanent wars, the permanent war economies,
the struggle for more and better jobs, and for a workers party that fights for
a workers government . More than enough to do, right? Still a look back at some
of the stuff I wrote then does not a bad feel to it. Read on.
*******WHATEVER HAPPENED TO SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE?
DEFEND THE
ENLIGHTENMENT
PRIVATE RELIGIOUS
EXPRESSION –YES (IF YOU NEED IT). PUBLIC FUNDING-NO
Let us face it there has been
a deep and sustained retrogression of human thought over the last generation or
so. Apparently the progressive goals of the Enlightenment have run out of steam
and night has fallen over much of human thought. And not for the first time.
Remember the Middle Ages. In many ways militant leftists are reduced to a
flat-out defense of those values that in an earlier time we thought were merely
the base-line from which human progress would surge. The fight against
religious obscurantism represented by the key fight to separate church and
state in order to make religious expression, at most, a personal expression was
one of those important values. We are definitely back on the base-line on this
one.
Why do I bring this up now? A
glance at the news on any given day brings forth new horrors done in the name
of religion. And these actions most certainly are not to defend the right to
personal religious expression. Name the religion-Christianity, Judaism,
Islamism, Hinduism, etc., and the fundamentalists are spearheading the drive to
impose their religions on the body politic- weapons in hand. Damn, even the
Hari Krishnas are getting belligerent these days. What has got this writer’s
blood pressure up today, however, is the erosion of the principle of separation
of church and state in this country.
Recent newspaper article really brought this point home. Apparently a town in the suburbs of Houston, Texas is the capital of the religious building boom. And town administrators, although they do not apparently know what to about it, are not happy. This small town has 51 churches, temples, shines, whatever, all exempt from local property tax laws. All it seems you need to set up shop there is to have been directed there by god. Curious, very curious. Shinto, Hindu, 12th Day Adventist, Jainist it doe not matter. Apply and you are in. The town administrator in charge of permits, bewildered by it all, sees no way out in the face of god’s wrath. Let us help him.
To answer our befuddled Texas
town public official. Here is the word. Tell your applicants this- If you want
your storefront or shopping mall church- pay up. No more tax exemptions. Hey,
remember this country was founded on a principle of free private religious
expression- in the gathered churches of those times you paid your own way.
Where the hell did we go wrong?
Religion is deeply embedded
in the human psyche. No question about that. As long as humankind fought
against the mysterious forces of nature, for the most part unsuccessfully, a religious
explanation for humankind’s plight made some sense. And certainly it was no
worst than some other explanations. However, as humankind through science,
technology and more sophisticated organization of society began to tame nature
that rationale lost its force. That is where the ideas of the Enlightenment
began to come into there own. Religion, if necessary, became a personal
expression of citizens in a secular society. Or, at least, for the past couple of
centuries we thought that is where we were heading. We are duty-bound to start
that fight all over again. Why? If one recalls the last time that religious fundamentalism
motivated human thought was ascendant was during medieval times. That used to
be called the Dark Ages. And, brothers
and sisters, that lasted for a long time. Forward, again.
No comments:
Post a Comment